Printed on :
In simply two months, on November 20, the FIFA World Cup will start in Qatar. A month of competitors on this small emirate of the Center East. This World Cup will probably be performed in air-conditioned stadiums and in a rustic that doesn’t respect human rights. Is that cheap sufficient?
Two months from World Cup 2022 soccer a Qatar, consciences start to get up. A number of former gamers have known as for a boycott. Eric Cantona, for instance, who stigmatizes ” an ecological aberration and a human horror “. ” What number of 1000’s of deaths to construct stadiums? asks the previous French worldwide. Similar story with Philipp Lahm captain of the German world champion workforce in 2014. He is not going to go to Qatar.
There may be additionally this initiative and this entrance web page Journal of Réunionprobably the most broadly learn newspaper of the Indian Ocean island: With out us. “This newspaper is not going to speak in regards to the World Cup through the competitors, as Flavien Rosso, head of the sports activities division explains:” There’s a entire collection of fully aberrant selections, by way of violation of rights, by way of violation of the surroundings, by way of disrespect for minorities. We needed to say “sufficient”, figuring out that it’s not essentially Qatar that we’re judging and condemning. We actually choose the way in which this World Cup was constructed and that, in our opinion, is incompatible with the values that, for 46 years, The newspaper attempt to develop. “
► To (re) pay attention: Qatar: a World Cup at what worth?
For some gamers, it’s tough to take a stand
One other response prompted quite a lot of noise, that of the French actor Vincent Lindon. He, whose roles we all know in cinema and who chaired the final Cannes Movie Competition, factors to a ” ecological aberration ” and the ” disrespect for the ideology of human rights “. ” We reside in a large asylum “, He will get carried away. An investigation by the British newspaper The Guardian in 2021 they reported 1000’s of migrant staff who died in Qatar since work started on the World Cup. Vincent Lindon regrets, as he defined to the tv channel France 5, that no present nice participant, prone to go to the World Cup, takes a stand and refuses to go to Qatar: ” It sounds simplistic however it could possibly solely come from the gamers. It can’t come from a state. A state has no proper to ask the gamers or Didier Deschamps to boycott the World Cup. However one participant, he’s free! He’s an artist! He can! So I feel he’d be good, yeah. “
Take a stand in opposition to Qatar? It will not be so simple as it sounds for a gamer. Let’s take Lionel Messi from Argentina, Neymar from Brazil and Kylian Mbappé from France. They play for Paris Saint-Germain whose proprietor shareholder is none apart from Qatar. And past that, if you happen to have a look at the 32 nations certified for the World Cup, no participant of any choice has up to now known as for a boycott. Disappointing? No, says Benjamin Moukandjo, now retired from the sector and who performed the 2014 World Cup with Cameroon: ” It is easy, while you’re executed along with your profession, to say you should not go. However while you’re in full swing, who would not prefer to play on the World Cup? It’s the Holy Grail, the head of soccer. After all, I am not saying that we’ve to simply accept every little thing as a result of we’ve to play a World Cup, removed from it! Now, taking a stand when you find yourself a participant, I perceive them as a result of it is extremely very tough … “
A counterproductive boycott?
And if we do not have to go to Qatar, so far as human rights are involved, ought to we go to Russia 4 years in the past for the final soccer World Cup or to Beijing to China for the 2008 Olympic Video games? The query have to be requested. For Jean-Baptiste Guégan in any case, creator of Geopolitics of sport, one other rationalization of the worldboycotting these main occasions isn’t the answer: The boycott is the worst answer, as a result of dialogue, confrontation and the creation of a stability of energy with the nation in query are instantly prevented. And, on this case, if you wish to change the problem of human rights and the situation of staff on the spot, you need to go there, you need to confront them and you need to use this World Cup as a sink. “
► To (re) take heed to: Qatar 2022, a World Cup in unknown territory
Making an attempt to weigh from the within, that is what the NGO Amnesty Worldwide has been striving to do for 10 years, from the awarding of the World Cup to Qatar, to publishing polls. Some reviews have additionally prompted the Qatari authorities to vary labor legislation marginally. Sabine Gagnier, answerable for discrimination points at Amnesty, believes that we should proceed to place strain on Doha on this approach: ” To this point, our group has not known as for a boycott of the World Cup. We predict that is certainly a possibility to show the highlight on these violations and entice world opinion to denounce this example. And we hope that it will pressure Qatar to vary the working situations there. “
Anyway, the countdown has begun. In two months, on November 20, the inaugural match between Qatar and Ecuador will probably be performed. A month of competitions till the ultimate on 18 December.
Interview by Christophe Diremszian, Christophe Jousset and Frédéric Suteau